Art 2074 A Comparative Analysis of Utilitarianism Theory and Maslahah in the Legal Protection of Child Street Workers in Medan City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52029/jis.v7i1.484Keywords:
Child Street Workers, Legal Protection, Utilitarianism, Maslahah, Children's RightsAbstract
The phenomenon of child street workers in Medan City remains a significant social and legal issue, characterized by economic exploitation, limited access to education, and inadequate protection of children's rights. Despite the existence of various legal regulations, the implementation of child protection policies continues to face structural challenges. This study aims to analyze the legal protection provided to child street workers through the Center for Child Study and Protection (Pusat Kajian dan Perlindungan Anak/PKPA) in Medan City and to compare the relevance of Utilitarianism and Maslahah theories as evaluative frameworks. This research employs a juridical-empirical method with a socio-legal approach. Data were collected through interviews with PKPA administrators, Islamic law scholars, and government officials, supported by field observations and document analysis. The data were analyzed descriptively using the perspectives of Utilitarianism and Maslahah. The findings indicate that PKPA has implemented legal protection measures through participatory data collection, non-formal education, psychosocial assistance, restoration of legal identity, family reintegration, and policy advocacy. These programs have contributed to improving the fulfillment of children's rights and welfare. However, their effectiveness remains constrained by structural factors, including family poverty, the culture of street-based charity, and limited inter-agency coordination. From a Utilitarian perspective, legal protection generates benefits for children and society but may risk overlooking the interests of vulnerable groups. In contrast, Maslahah theory provides a more comprehensive framework by emphasizing the protection of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, the prevention of harm, and the integration of individual and social welfare. Therefore, Maslahah is considered a more relevant normative foundation for strengthening the legal protection of child street workers in Medan City.
References
Ashur, Muhammad al-Tahir Ibn. Maqāṣid Syariah Islamiyah. Vol. 3. Wizārat al-Awqāf wa al-Syu’ūn al-Islāmiyyah, 2004.
Asiah, Nur. “Maslahah Menurut Konsep Imam Al-Ghazali.” Diktum: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum 18, No. 1 (2020): Hal. 123.
Efendi, Jonaedi, dan Prasetijo Rijadi. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. 2 ed. Kencana, 2022.
Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid al-. Syifā’ al-Ghalīl. 1 ed. Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyah, 1999.
Hananto, V. Andri. “Utilitarianisme dan Keseimbangan Antara Kepentingan Umum dan Kepentingan Individu.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 32, No. 1 (2025): 72–98. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss1.art4.
Hermanto, Agus. “Konsep Maslahat dalam Menyikapi Masalah Kontemporer (Studi Komparatif al-Tûfi dan al-Ghazali).” Al-’Adalah 14, No. 2 (2017): 433–460. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v14i2.2414.
Maimun, dan M. Darwadi MR. “Relasi Sadd Aż-Żari’ah dengan MaqᾹṣid Asy-Syari’ah: Aplikasinya Dalam Penetapan Hukum Pada Kasus-Kasus Fikih Kontemporer.” ASAS 12, No. 1 (2020): 37–59.
Mangunhardjana, A. Isme-Isme Dalam Etika Dari A sampai Z. PT. Kanisius, 1999.
Murād, Faḍl bin ‘Abd Allāh. Al-Qawā‘id al-Umm Li al-Fiqh. Dar Ibn Katsir, 2025.
Saptaningrum, Lathifah Azhar. “Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Perlindungan Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum Ditinjau dari Teori Utilitarianisme.” Journal Equitable 8, No. 1 (2023): 95–110.
Sarif, Akbar, dan Ridzwan Ahmad. “Konsep Maslahat dan Mafsadah menurut Imam al-Ghazali.” TSAQAFAH 13, No. 2 (2018): 353–368. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v13i2.1183.
Septiansyah, Zainal B., dan Muuhammad Ghalib. “Konsepsi Utilitarianisme dalam Filsafat Hukum dan Implementasinya di Indonesia.” Ijtihad: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial 34, No. 1 (2018): 2–34.
Smith, Martin. “Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832).” Notes and Queries 28, No. 4 (August 1, 1981): 325-b-325. https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/28-4-325b.
Taufik, Andi Darma, Fitri Wahyuni, dan Hendra Gunawan. “Analisis Sejarah dan Perkembangan Teori Utilitarianisme Terhadap Hukum Indonesia.” Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi 10, No. 1 (2024): 88–102. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v10i1.11107.
Wahyuni. “Konsep Aliran Utilitarianisme dalam Filsafat Hukum.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 4, No. 1 (2025): 1–10.
Zairudin, Ahmad, Dominikus Rato, dan Bayu Dwi Anggono. “Konsep Aliran Filsafat Hukum Utilitarianisme Dan Relevansinya Terhadap Konstruksi Pengaturan Pengawasan Pemilu.” Jurnal Rechtens 12, No. 2 (2023): 273–286. https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v12i2.2489.
Zulkifli, Zulkifli, Zeni Luthfiyah, Mustofa Umar, Harti Winarni, Zainul Arifin, dan Supriati H. Rahayu. “Anak Jalanan Dalam Konstelasi Hukum Indonesia.” Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan 2, No. 1 (2023): 95–108. https://doi.org/10.47200/awtjhpsa.v2i1.1570.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Iqbal Hanafi Nasution, Mhd Yadi Harahap, Iwan; Riski Maulana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
